Friday, January 16, 2015

Racine Police Chief Art Howell
and the Poop Police
CASE# 2014CFOOO1506

When it comes to the truth in court, veracity by State witnesses is going to be an issue.  Along with the veracity issues before the court, the competence of City of Racine Police will also be on trial.

Let’s begin with the State of Wisconsin star witness Brian Polk.

Brian Polk's journey to become a credible witness for the State will be a long and arduous journey. Brian Polk will have to convince jurors he defended himself against Mr. Hanson with a tree branch.  This tree branch defense was asserted in a police report filed by City of Racine Police Officer Donna Hanke.  RCCC believes this defense to be a fraud, a lie before the court.

Video evidence of the incident does not appear to illuminate Mr. Polk defending himself  on Kurt Hanson's property with a tree branch, unless the tree branch is the wooden handles of a gun.

Approximately 14 days after the incident, City of Racine Police Officer Todd Hoover secured video evidence of the altercation from Mr. Hanson’s  neighbor.

For over 60 days, the City of Racine has had in its possession video evidence we believe debunks the police report filed by City of Racine Police Officer Donna Hanke.

Wisconsin court rules require attorneys to immediately notify the court of any veracity issues before the court. The rule we speak of is SCR 20:3:3.  (candor towards the tribunal).
Scott Letteney represents the City of Racine, so why has Mr. Letteney not notified the court of the misinformation before the court as required by law, and further acted to correct the defective complaint?

We believe the answer to this question is the City of Racine is actively engaged in a cover-up to reduce liability.

The liability issue began on 11-01-2014 when City of Racine Police failed to conduct a proper investigation of the Polk/Hanson altercation and before taking action against Mr. Hanson.

The City of Racine failed to take a witness statement of the altercation,  and further failed to recover video evidence before taking action against Mr. Hanson.  These failures by City of Racine Police are basic failures of investigation class 101.

We further believe the incident commander was unprepared for a non aggressive dog to enter the scene. Had the incident commander acted in a proper and professional manner, he would have already been aware that the dog was not malicious.  The City of Racine Police was quick to list previous encounters with Mr. Hanson, but the incident commander failed to recognize by City of Racine Police own records that all previous police encounters with Mr. Hanson’s dog were friendly.

So, with the City of Racine being led by an incident commander acting as a jack booted terrorist, the City of Racine killed Mr. Hanson’s dog without cause or provocation. City of Racine Police Chief Art Howell described Mr. Hanson’s dog as a “distraction”.   A distraction is not cause to kill. 

The City of Racine Police knowingly and willingly shot and killed Mr. Hanson’s dog. The dog displayed no aggressive behavior before being shot by police. Was this shooting of Mr. Hanson’s dog an act of malice by Racine Police, perhaps even premeditation?  We think so. The City of Racine took property without due process, an illegal act by badged cowards.

If Art Howell is subpoenaed into court by defense to testify about Racine Police actions of 11-01-2014,  Art Howell may expose what his department is,  an untrained, undisciplined group of thugs.  Art’s testimony may further illuminate himself as an incompetent buffoon, a bad joke on the City of Racine. 

Veracity....embrace it !

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Alice Rudebusch, Court Commissioner

Remember the Wendy's TV commercial  "Where's the Beef?"

Our featured court case has 27 City of Racine Police officers"FLUFFING" for Art Howell. 
In this video, police are the "bun". 

With 27 Police officers involved in a dog poop incident and all the fluff created by the City of Racine Police Department,

the questions should be:

Where is the Truth?  ......or 
Where is the Branch?

Case # 2014CF0001506

State of Wisconsin vs. Kurt Hanson

"The Dog Poop Incident"

How do you make a mountain out of a molehill?

Just ask Art Howell and he will demonstrate how to waste 27 officers exacerbating a "dog poop incident" into 

Don't bother wasting the officers time investigating and interviewing witnesses, don't bother looking for surveillance video. Just call in Art Howell's undisciplined militarized police and they will take care of that pooping dog.

For those of you that are unaware of this incident, or wish to further your understanding of this case.

You may reference the following sites.

The State has submitted it's badge studded witness list to the court for trial.  A whopping 27 City of Racine Police Officers have been named for trial over dog poop.
Not a misprint folks, the witness list is provided further down the blog.
This badge studded  trial event will also feature the prosecution star of the show ......... 
Mr. Brian Polk.
Mr. Polk is an apple that didn't fall far from the tree branch.

We believe Mr. Polk may claim in court that he picked up a tree branch to defend himself.  Was the closest thing to a tree branch in Mr. Polk's hand the wood handles of a gun? We think so.

It appears the City of Racine Police Department was too lazy, stupid or indifferent to conduct a proper investigation, interview witnesses and acquire video evidence before taking action against Mr. Hanson.  We are unaware of any tree branch being secured for evidence for trial by The City of Racine Police Department.

How can the City of Racine Police Department allow an armed individual to go to anothers house, cause an altercation, brandish a gun, call police of the altercation and have the other person arrested?

We don't know the answer to that question, do you?

Below is the witness list for the prosecution:  27 COPS, and a tree branch?


Jeffrey S BeBow # 1916, Racine Police Department
Peter Boeck# 1267, Racine Police Department
Dennis P Cecchini# 1997, Racine Police Department
Melissa J Diener #1728, Racine Police Department
Donna L Hanke# 1188, Racine Police Department
Frederick L Hyatt# 1996, Racine Police Department
Edward F Ide # 1193, Racine Police Department
Warren Jepson# 1917, RPD - The Hidden Horse (sic)
Scott M Keland # 1984, Racine Police Department
David J Kelly# 1940, Racine Police Department
Christopher M Kupper# 1592, Racine Police Department
Paul A Lafond# 1872; Racine Police Department
Scott M Leslie #1941, Racine Police Department
Michael G Mahnke# 1846, Racine Police Department
Amy L Matsen# 1983, Racine Police Department
Frank W Miller # 1260, Racine Police Department
Juan Mireles# 1978 Jr, Racine Police Department
Stephen J Mueller# 1333, Racine Police Department
Brinelle A Nabors# 2722, Racine Police Department
Donald E Nuttall# 1644 Jr, Racine Police Department
David J Rybarik # 1857, Racine Police Department
John T Schneider# 1906, Racine Police Department
Chad Stillman# 1225, Racine Police Department
Robert Thillemann # 1331, Racine Police Department
Richard L Toeller # 1561, Racine Police Department
Daniel M Tredo # 1196, Racine Police Department
Joe M Villalobos # 1772, Racine Police Department

And the star witness for the prosecution:

Brian K Polk
1651 Russet St
Racine, WI 53405

Folks, Mr. Hanson has been incarcerated since 11- 4 -2014.
Mr. Hanson does not have the financial resources to bail out of jail.  The City of Racine has sworn into court records claims that are debunked by video evidence.

Truth is, the City of Racine and it's agents will also be on trial.

Demand Veracity ! 

Friday, January 2, 2015


Quid est veritas?.....Pontius Pilate
What is truth?
  1. conformity to facts; accuracy.
    "officials expressed doubts concerning the veracity of the story"
    synonyms:truthfulnesstruthaccuracy, correctness, faithfulnessfidelityMore
    • habitual truthfulness.
      "voters should be concerned about his veracity and character"
Alice Rudebusch 
Racine County Court Commissioner

In Racine County Courts, there is a problem with public officials seeking and presenting the truth.  
The value of veracity I speak of concerns police, prosecution and above all, judges.

When judges refuse to look at the truth and fail to demand veracity in it's courts, there is little hope for justice.
There is a current case in the Racine County Court system that involves the incompetence and corruption of the Racine Police Department.  

This case I speak of involves an officers report filled with errors and a judge that has not acted on the truth.  This is the current sad state of affairs in Racine County government.

We are here to illuminate featured cases in Racine County Courts.  Some will be disturbing, others enlightening.  Some may highlight the insanity of our judges, and others may reflect wisdom, case by case.

Our first featured case will be:
State vs. Kurt Hanson

Our opening case features a defective complaint sworn into court records.

A link to this case is presented at

Embrace veracity!